As was to be predicted, London’s Financial Times reacted negatively to
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez’s announcement of a speeding up of
land reform. We did not expect less from the FT, a paper that has
always unashamedly defended the interests of capital. However, what we
did not expect was for the FT to argue that the “best way to address
rural poverty”, was for businesses to “pay decent wages and guarantee
good working conditions for its workers”!
The oil supply to the US from Venezuela has been cut once in recent
years. The reason for this cut was the bosses’ lockout at Petroleos de
Venezuela (PDVSA) that took place at the end of 2002 and the beginning
of 2003. Now the recent trip of President Chavez to China has made top
ranking members of the US administration uneasy.
The dispute between Venezuela and Colombia over the kidnapping of a
FARC leader in Caracas continues and threatens to involve other Latin
American countries. It is becoming increasingly clear that this
incident is part of a renewed offensive by Washington against
Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution.
Dramatic events are unfolding in Venezuela. Although the nationalisation of Venepal in itself it does not yet mean a qualitative change in the class nature of the Venezuelan Revolution, this bold measure certainly signifies a step in the right direction. It indicates that the working class is intervening in the Revolution with increasing determination, pressing for its independent class interests, demanding a break with capitalism and pushing the Revolution forwards.
UNT organiser Ricardo Galindez spoke to Ramon Samblas about the
progress of this new trade union organisation in Venezuela and the
latest events that have taken place in this Latin American country. An
edited version of this interview also appeared in today's left-wing
daily The Morning Star.
The progress of the Venezuelan Revolution has inevitably brought it
into conflict with the vested interests of the oligarchy. At every step
the demands of the masses in both town and village clash with the
so-called sacred right of property. Upon the resolution of this
contradiction the future of the Revolution depends.