Bolivia

Reply to Luis Oviedo - Part Three - The Malvinas: Marxism and War

Written by Alan Woods Tuesday, 17 February 2004
PrintE-mail
We continue this reply by taking up the question of the 1982 Malvinas/Falklands war, explaining what the real position of the British Marxists was at the time. In answer to Oviedo's blatant distortions Alan Woods explains that they opposed the war as an imperialist war on both sides, and adopted a genuine internationalist position. To be continued.
 

An appeal for a rational discussion: Reply to Luis Oviedo - Part Two

Written by Alan Woods Monday, 16 February 2004
PrintE-mail
Alan Woods continues his reply laying emphasis on the position of the Communist International on the mass organisations and stressing the need to unite the piqueteros movement in Argentina.  To be continued.
 

An appeal for a rational discussion: Reply to Luis Oviedo - Part One

Written by Alan Woods Friday, 13 February 2004
PrintE-mail
In the three articles that Luis Oviedo has written in answer to my article published on January 7 (Marxism versus Sectarianism - Reply to Luis Oviedo) a number of very important issues are raised. These questions deserve the most careful consideration by Marxists in Britain, Argentina and internationally. However, in order to clarify the issues raised and to educate the cadres (which ought to be the aim of every polemic) it is necessary to avoid heated language, distortions and personal attacks that only serve to divert attention away from the political questions. Such an approach will only confuse matters instead of clarifying them.
   

Bolivia is moving towards a third uprising

Written by Jorge Martin Thursday, 29 January 2004
PrintE-mail
The national enlarged meeting of the Bolivian Workers’ Union (COB) gathered in Cochabamba on January 22, and decided to call for an indefinite general strike with road blockades in twenty days time if Mesa’s government does not concede the demands of the October insurrection and continues with its announced austerity measures. The COB meeting “ended with the decision to take power, by closing down Parliament." This decision marks the end of the truce given by the worker and peasant leaders to Carlos Mesa’s government.
 

Marxism versus Sectarianism - Reply to Luis Oviedo

Written by Alan Woods Wednesday, 17 December 2003
PrintE-mail
My attention was recently drawn to an article signed by Luis Oviedo, entitled The Counterrevolutionary Position of Socialist Appeal. Having read the article, I could not decide whether it was the product of bad faith or simple ignorance. Certainly, the method used is contrary to every basic principle of Marxism and above all Trotskyism, which comrade Oviedo and the Partido Obrero claim to defend.
   

The beginning of the second Bolivian revolution

Written by Michel Wattignies* Monday, 15 December 2003
PrintE-mail

This is an article written for Pierre Broué's magazine Cahier Leon Trotsky under the name of Michel Wattignies in answer to Luis Oviedo's article.
See the original in French:
Début de la deuxième révolution bolivienne

 

Bolivia: Mesa's government shows its real face

Written by Miguel Campos Tuesday, 18 November 2003
PrintE-mail
"This government is not at all different from the government of Sanchez de Lozada. Carlos Mesa has not listened to the message of the El Alto Indian rebellion against the sale of gas" These are the words of one of the leaders of the Bolivian October insurrection, Roberto de la Cruz.  They sum up very clearly the real meaning of the bourgeois government of Carlos Mesa and the conclusions sections of the masses and most of the revolutionary vanguard are already drawing.
   

Page 9 of 10

Home » The Americas